<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.smartphonemag.com/cms" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Smartphone &amp;amp;amp; Pocket PC magazine - Comments for &quot;My Five Favorite Windows Mobile Utilities&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.smartphonemag.com/cms/_archives/Feb07/fivefave.aspx</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;My Five Favorite Windows Mobile Utilities&quot;</description>
 <language>en-US</language>
<item>
 <title>This was a terrible list, no</title>
 <link>http://www.smartphonemag.com/cms/_archives/Feb07/fivefave.aspx#comment-137260</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This was a terrible list, no offense but THESE are your favorite 5 mobile applications? A file manager that only works slightly better than the built-in file manager, a hack-it registry editor application that at best is only going to give you a slight performance enhancement, might crash your device, and has no practical application long term in the use of the device; three different programs to view content offline when a smartphone can get Internet anytime it wants, and a couple blogging utilities? Get real! If I was going to publish list of favs I would meet certain criteria to even have them make this type of list.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;First, free software is always better. You can&#039;t tell me that there isn&#039;t one opensource program out there you couldn&#039;t see putting in your top 5. Second, it should be functional for everyone and applicable to a variety of functions. You really think a third party file browser is more usefull then a PDF viewer, an app to run flash locally, compression utilities, or media software? Finally, backup. You have two backup solutions when activesync backs up all your documents automatically, what do you have application wise you can&#039;t reinstall in like 5 minutes? If your top 5 included something like Office mobile, complex configuration changes, etc. I might think it was warrented; but this whole article just comes across as a big push to sell obscure and useless software to people who view you as an authority. I find that a little sad.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 07:28:17 -0600</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>socratesfoot</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 137260 at http://www.smartphonemag.com/cms</value>
</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>


