<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.smartphonemag.com/cms" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Smartphone &amp;amp;amp; Pocket PC magazine - Comments for &quot;Everything you need to know about the scrolling behavior of the two new Internet Explorer plug-ins MultiIE 4 and PIEPlus 2.x&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.smartphonemag.com/cms/blog/9/everything-you-need-know-about-scrolling-behavior-two-new-internet-explorer-plug-ins-multiie-</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Everything you need to know about the scrolling behavior of the two new Internet Explorer plug-ins MultiIE 4 and PIEPlus 2.x&quot;</description>
 <language>en-US</language>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.smartphonemag.com/cms/blog/9/everything-you-need-know-about-scrolling-behavior-two-new-internet-explorer-plug-ins-multiie-#comment-3424</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;galt, you&#039;re absolutely right about the &quot;simulated&quot; page downs in both MultiIE and PIEPlus looking very ugly / distracting / not working at all / having problems. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The regular reghack and the plain IEM page up/down indeed works better. Too bad it just can&#039;t be dynamically switched off/on during using the app because the registry value is read by IEM during start and not dynamically. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hope the authors of the two plug-ins find where IEM stores this in the dynamic memory and can modify it on-the-fly from inside the plug-in. I&#039;ll contact them directly and ask them.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 05:54:24 -0500</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>Werner Ruotsalainen</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 3424 at http://www.smartphonemag.com/cms</value>
</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>


