<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.smartphonemag.com/cms" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Smartphone &amp;amp;amp; Pocket PC magazine - Comments for &quot;TouchBrowser V1.1.3 not there yet...&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.smartphonemag.com/cms/blog/414/touchbrowser-v113-not-there-yet</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;TouchBrowser V1.1.3 not there yet...&quot;</description>
 <language>en-US</language>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.smartphonemag.com/cms/blog/414/touchbrowser-v113-not-there-yet#comment-7561</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;They should :) This browser (shell) does require a lot of additional work. That is, it&#039;s nice to see the dev is taking our criticism seriously and tries to enhance / bugfix his program.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BTW, the case was the same with Webby, the first version of which, initially, received the same bad review from me as with Touch Browser 1.0.2. Finally, also largely because of my criticism, it became a pretty much decent browser and I even nominated it for last year&#039;s Best Software Awards.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate> <key>pubDate</key>
 <value>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 07:20:23 -0500</value>
</pubDate>
 <dc:creator> <key>dc:creator</key>
 <value>Werner Ruotsalainen</value>
</dc:creator>
 <guid> <key>guid</key>
 <attributes> <isPermaLink>false</isPermaLink>
</attributes>
 <value>comment 7561 at http://www.smartphonemag.com/cms</value>
</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>


